Community College EdLeaders

ED 815: Rethinking Leadership

 

Course Instructional Staff:

Instructors:  

Fred McFarlane, Ph.D.
(Community college/postsecondary focus)
fmcfarla@mail.sdsu.edu


Ian Pumpian, Ph.D.
(PreK-12 focus)
ipumpian@mail.sdsu.edu

Technology Support:

Roxana Flores
support@interwork.sdsu.edu

 

Course  Description

Concepts of individual and group leadership in educational environments. Practices and policies of effective management and leadership; ethical and emerging trends in leadership styles.

Student Learning Outcome:

We will teach this course in a merged format with the two groups of students.  This will require that all of us work together to:

  • deepen our individual and collective abilities to listen, reflect and engage in critical conversations about leadership thought, theory, perspectives, literature and experiences;
  • strengthen our individual and collective abilities to listen, reflect and engage in critical conversations about organizational effectiveness in a rapidly changing world;
  • increase our individual and collective abilities to listen, reflect and engage in critical conversations about effective leadership behaviors and styles and assess our personal leadership strengths;
  • rethink, discuss and write about the leadership needed to make in educational practice and educational institutions effective in the future;
  • apply emerging leadership thoughts, theories, and practices via real educational situations, challenges and opportunities;
  • redefine self as an Ed.D candidate and reexamine our leadership strengths, attributes and development needs;
  • reexamine the notion of organizational culture and commit to pursuing an organization of excellence.

Student Expectations:

Learning within a cohort group is a model of relational leadership. The quality and depth of each person’s learning depends on the full participation of each member of the cohort.

It is our expectation that each participant will read and study assigned and related materials so that each can actively contribute to discussions on line and during class discussions. All participants are expected to attend all classes and actively engage and monitor on line activities. We expect that all course requirements will be completed on time and be of a quality expected of a doctoral student and an educational leader.

Course Requirements:

  1. Read all assignments and actively participate in class discussions and on line assignments.
  2. From your readings on leadership and your assessment of your own strengths, develop a platform

Suggested Readings:

  1. Covey, S.M. (2006). The Speed of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything.  New York, NY. Free Press.
  2. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal Leadership. Boston, MA. Harvard Business School Publishing.
  3. George, B. (2007).  True North. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  4. Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R, & Switzler, A. (2002). Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High. McGraw-Hill.
  5. Pink, D. (2006). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. New York, NY. Berkley Publishing Group.
  6. Postman, N. (1995). The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School. New York, NY. Random House, Inc.
  7. Runde, C.E., Flanagan, T.A. (2007). Becoming a Conflict Competent Leader: How You and Your Organization Can Manage Conflict Effectively. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  8. Studer, Q. Hardwiring Excellence. ( 2003) Gulf breeze,Fl. Fire Starter Publishing.
  9. Quinn, R.E. (2000). Change the World: How Ordinary People Can Accomplish Extraordinary Results. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  10. Quinn, R.E. (1996). Deep Change: Discovering the Leader Within. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass, Inc.

 

Assignment Detail:

Click each assignment to view the detail.

  1. 360-degree assessment and leadership profile
  2. Opening and closing remarks
  3. Create a new major initiative designed to enhance the purpose/implementation of the California Master plan (preK-16)
  4. Baldridge Award Application
  5. Lead book club/exercises on assigned readings

1. 360-degree assessment and leadership profile

Due: October 26th

Each student will complete the development of a leadership profile including a 360-degree assessment.  Details will be outlined during the first class session.  The students will complete a self-assessment and a 360-degree assessment.  The results will be presented in an individual and group format.

The instruments will assess the student’s current leadership practices, identify personality attributes, and describe preferences in learning and problem solving.  The instruments include:

The Leadership Profile (TLP), which is a 360-degree feedback instrument, provides personalized feedback on leadership skills and characteristics on the basis of self-assessment and an average of the observers’ assessments. This assessment serves to provide learners with a solid understanding of leadership and leadership development. It offers multiple perspectives on their current leadership performance.
 
The TLP has theoretical roots in both transactional and transformational leadership. These schools of leadership offer learners a broad scope of leadership theories and practices. The TLP considers both skills and characteristics. Coupled with the theoretical basis, this provides learners with a strong foundation for understanding leadership development. The TLP offers learners and colleagues the opportunity to assess the learner’s current leadership performance. Learners can compare their perspective with the perspectives of their colleagues. The comparison provides learners with the platform for creating their individual leadership development plan.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) reports static personality types based on an individual’s mental processes, or how an individual thinks. The MBTI has a complex theoretical base and strong practical applications. Knowledge of an individual’s personality provides indications to their propensity for how they typically perceive and approach situations and people, collect and share information, and make decisions.

The Kolb Learning Styles Inventory (LSI) assesses an individual’s preferences for learning (Kolb, 1999). The LSI was developed from Experiential Learning Theory, which attends to the affective, reflective, analytical, and behavioral aspects of the learning process.  The benefits of using the instrument are threefold. First, the results assist in customizing development experiences for optimal learning. Second, knowledge of an individual’s learning styles assists the learner to design professional and leadership development. Third, the LSI serves as a problem-solving model. This model introduces a methodology that considers a comprehensive analysis of decision-making for leaders to apply regardless of the scope of the issue.

Back to top

2. Opening and closing remarks

Opening Remark Due: September 8th
Closing Remark Due: December 8th

It is not unusual for educational organizations to have some formal event that kicks off a school year and another at its conclusion. It may be a staff development day/conference, commencement, a stakeholder luncheon or ceremony, a departmental/unit meeting or the first or last meeting of a major taskforce or working committee. It is common for one of the organization’s figureheads (for example, the CEO, Chancellor, President, Superintendent, Principal, Dean or Director) to provide some words of wisdom as a means of kicking off (or concluding) the event and the year.

Leaders use these three to five minute opportunities to strategically speak to their colleagues and constituencies. It is an opportunity to share and reinforce who they are, what they value, and what they expect. Leaders use these opportunities to challenge and celebrate the organization’s assets, performance and mission. They convey a sense of both personal and shared values and vision. Aspiring leaders can learn a great deal from constructing and critiquing these opening remarks. At one level, it is a ‘toastmasters exercise” and a skill set most effective leaders will further master with experience and feedback. At another deeper level however, these speaking opportunities provide important insights regarding the leader and information regarding the organization’s climate, health and culture. If you were responsible for creating a rubric for evaluating these speeches what would be some of the indicators you would evaluate and why? 

Imagine you are an identified leader on a team responsible for the design of California’s Master plan for K-16 education. It should not be that hard to imagine, after all in many ways its true! You are engaging in a course of study and development designed to lead our K-16 educational system into the next decade. And now, you are assigned the responsibility of:

  1. providing opening remarks to the 815 Ed. D cohort. Come prepared on first class to deliver these start of the semester remarks. What is important for you to tell us about the semester/journey we are embarking on to change public education? Take 3-5 minutes to be our leader, to set our direction, to remind us of our mission, to give us our charge, our challenge, or inspiration. Teach us and lead us! Set us on a course towards excellence. Feel free to use/modify remarks you have made before in your organizational homes or create anew.
    - September 8, 2007
     
  2. providing closing remarks to the 815 Ed.D cohort. Come prepared on last class to deliver the end of the semester remarks. What is important for you to tell us we conclude this step on our journey to change public education. Take 3-5 minutes to be our leader, to set review where we were, are and are going and to challenge us, to remind us of our mission, to continue our charge and our challenge. Teach us, inspire us and lead us! Feel free to use/modify remarks you have made before in your organizational homes or create anew.
    - December 8, 2007

Back to top

3. Create a new major initiative designed to enhance the purpose/implementation of the California Master plan (preK-16)

Due: October 20th

This group project is a PBL of sorts except you are free to define the problem. You will be responsible for identifying an area of need, a barrier to the overall effectiveness of the master plan and/or its intended purpose. Your group needs to identify the problem/need, provide an objective rationale for why the problem merits a major initiative, and then design the initiative. Hint: Try and backward map issues confronted in your organization to the Master plan. Look for areas of misalignment, or for areas of missed opportunities. Design your initiative to close one of these gaps. Design an initiative that will lead to excellent K-16 programs driven by the mission and resources of the California master plan. We will discuss the assignment and its requirements in more detail in class.

Back to top

4. Baldridge Award Application

Due: December 1st

Imagine yourselves in leadership roles in 2015. Imagine the years you have worked to create a strategic vision in your organization. A strategic vision driven by your mission, by a changing world, by the Master Plan initiative you helped design, and by the knowledge and skills you have acquired in your completed Ed.D program. The structure of your organization is well respected and certainly one component of your organization’s excellence. You are responsible for completing specific chapters of your organization(s) Baldridge application. We will discuss the assignment and its requirements in more detail in class.

Back to top

5. Lead book club/exercises on assigned readings

Due: December 8th

Each student will be responsible for leading lesson studies/book talks on various assigned and recommended texts. These lessons/discussions may be on-line or in class. They may involve providing a book/chapter notes, synopsis, critiques or posing questions and big ideas and then monitoring a discussion board or in class activity.

Back to top

6. Discussion Boards

Your postings should reflect an understanding of the readings and show evidence that you are critically evaluating the question or issue at hand. Washington State University's Critical Thinking Project developed a set of guidelines for encouraging critical thinking skills in students. In a rubric designed by WSU, elements to demonstrating critical thinking skills are described. The guidelines are outlined below. You may wish to learn more by visiting the site: Washington State University: Critical Thinking Rubric.

Although you are not expected to demonstrate all seven elements of critical thinking in every posting, use these skills to contribute to fruitful and valuable discussions among your classmates.

  1. Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (and/or the source's position).
  2. Identifies and presents the STUDENT’S OWN perspective and position as it is important to the analysis of the issue.
  3. Identifies and considers OTHER salient perspectives and positions that are important to the analysis of the issue.
  4. Identifies and assesses the key assumptions.
  5. Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence and provides additional data/evidence related to the issue.
  6. Identifies and considers the influence of the context of the issue.
  7. Identifies and assesses conclusions, implications and consequences.

One last hint for getting others to read your posts....Changing the subject line clues people in to what you are going to say. Use an intriguing Subject line as the hook to getting more people to read what you postings.

Back to top